There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. They argued that freedom of speech will time and again be compromised by these political donations. They also invoked the constitution that is pillared on equally protecting each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This is seen to be against the pillars of the constitution.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.